Port of Long Beach/Port of Los Angeles
Truck Restrictions
The Port of Los Angeles, and the Port of Long Beach’s Clean Truck Program is completely changing the way we do business, and how we move freight in and out of these ports. This year, these ports have continued with their truck banning schedule, by denying entry to tractors that have a 2003 or older engine. There is a modification, that drivers can have performed on their engine, that will allow access to the ports. That retrofit is for 1994-2003 engines, and I have not seen it any cheaper than $10,000 for the change. I can’t see many of our contractors willing to spend that much money. Below is a list of the Clean Truck Program truck banning schedule:
Truck Banning Schedule
October 1, 2008 – All pre-1989 engines were banned from entering ports
January 1, 2010 – All 1989-1993 engines are banned, and 1994-2003 non-retrofitted engines are banned as well.
January 1, 2012 – All engines must be 2007 or newer to access ports.
As of January 1, 2010, we only have about 22% of our entire fleet that have compliant trucks to enter the ports. We have come up with a solution for our Owner-Operators that no longer have compliant equipment. We interviewed several drayage companies that could go into the port for us, load our containers on a chassis, bring them back to their facility, and then flip the cans onto our trailers. We have decided on a company to provide us with this service.
All coordinators need to be aware of what units on their board are compliant or not. Speak with your coordinator and tell them what year engine you have in your tractor. We can’t just go by what year of tractor that we have in the computer, because it is not uncommon for the model year of a tractor, and it’s engine to be different. For example: A 2004 truck may be equipped with a 2003 engine, which would make it non-compliant. Or a 1999 truck could have had an engine replaced, and it may have a 2006 engine, which would make it compliant.
If your truck is compliant (2004 or newer), then you are free to accept anything that loads/unloads in these ports. The truck will be able to enter the port, same as it always has.
If your truck is not compliant (2003 or older), then you can still accept freight the same as always. If you do accept a load that loads out of the port, then the we will have to deduct a portion of the charge from the rate of the load for the drayage, and flip service. ATO will continue to enter these loads into the computer at the normal rate, because they will not know until the load is accepted, if they will have a compliant truck, or a non-compliant truck picking it up. It will say in the order “NONCOMPLIANT TRUCK WILL HAVE TO PAY DRAY FEE OF $??? FOR PICKUP”. The $??? is part of the drayage/flip charge that Mercer is splitting with the driver. Once you accept the load, call ATO office, and let them know that the truck you accepted on the load is a non-compliant truck. You will notice that ATO will put a “D” at the end of the trip number, indicating that we have to “dray” the container. The drayage service will then go pick up the container, and take it to their facility. You will go to the drayage service, and have the container flipped onto your trailer.
A TWIC card will no longer be needed for pickup on these loads if they are picking up at the drayage facility, unless the TWIC is needed at the delivery end.
I know that I have talked to some drivers that think that the charge to the driver is not the best deal. I agree. It is costly. Keep in mind that we talked to several different drayage companies, and this was the best deal we could work out for our contractors. Mercer and the ATO office are also eating some of the total cost as well. We could have had no solution at all, and just not given anyone an option to load container freight. Looking at the ATO screen today, shows me that there is a lot of container freight in the system out there. I think that we will get an increase in container freight because the other companies that move long-haul cans out of the ports didn’t pursue this option. We will now get their freight, because they can’t cover it.
The downside is the charge. I think that Mercer is providing a good solution for contractors that just can’t afford to spend thousands of dollars to upgrade their equipment. Also, I know a lot of drivers that will be happy not to have to go into the ports to wait on a container anymore. Have a great day everyone!